Total Pageviews

Sunday 7 July 2013

Three Monks

"Physics aligns natural forces, managers align human forces
Management is music, no management is noise"

This post is about a video that we were asked to watch. The video in question is a short Chinese animated feature film produced by the Shanghai Animation Film Studio. After the cultural revolution and the fall of the political Gang of Four in 1976, the film was one of the first animations created as part of the rebirth period. It is also referred to as The Three Buddhist Priests. You can see the video here:



Background

The film is based on the ancient Chinese proverb -
"One monk will shoulder two buckets of water, two monks will share the load, but add a third and no one will want to fetch water."

A similar quote on the same lines can be found in the Telugu culture - "Three people should never start doing a piece of work, for, at the end, the work will still remain incomplete."

The film does not contain any dialogues, overcoming all language barriers and allowing it to be watched by any culture, and a different music instrument was used to signify each monk.


Story Highlight

A young monk lives a simple life in a temple on top of a hill. He has one daily task of hauling two buckets of water up the hill. He tries to share the job with another monk, but the carry pole is only long enough for one bucket. The arrival of a third monk prompts everyone to expect that someone else will take on the chore. Consequently, no one fetches water though everybody is thirsty. At night, a rat comes to scrounge and then knocks the candle-holder, leading to a devastating fire in the temple. The three monks finally unite together and make a concerted effort to put out the fire. Since then they understand the old saying "unity is strength" and begin to live a harmonious life. The temple never lacks water again.


 Management Lessons:

1. Joint Decision making / Participative Management: When two monks are carrying a bucket, there are conflicts around the load distribution. When the smaller monk tries to divide the pole into two parts using the length of his hands as a measure, the taller monk used his bigger hands to show that the bucket should be hung closer to the first monk. Finally to resolve the matter, the first monk measures the stick using a ruler while the other marks the mid-point, implying consensus among the two in the action.


2. Process Innovation/Improvement: When there were two monks they faced the problem of unbalanced loads wherein the one monk who had the bucket tied closer to him on the pole would have to bear more load than the other, they decided to mark the midpoint of the pole using a ruler so the burden was divided equally. Eventually, the three monks come up with an innovative solution. One monk goes to the bottom of the hill and fills the pails of water, one works the pulley to lift up the filled bucket and lower the empty one, while the third monk carries the water from pulley to monastery.

3. Productivity and Efficiency: At the end, the 3 monks work with a defined process in place and are able to get more buckets of water with very less effort compared to single person carrying two buckets or two persons carrying a single bucket.



4. Division of Labor: Clearly defined roles with mutual agreement brings in "management without management". Supervision of individuals becomes unnecessary at this point as a direct and immediate feedback can be obtained based on individual tasks. A delay in one task would hinder the other task.Since everyone is responsible for his/her assigned task, accountability increases and the system becomes transparent.


5. Responsibility: The three monks allow personal pride and ego to interfere with the performance of daily tasks, each believing that the other two should go downhill to fetch water. When a fire breaks out, however, they understand their responsibility and work in a team to save the temple.


Conclusion:

Through a simple theme, the movie tries to present the various facets of human mind, the way the thought process evolves and the various repercussions of such thought process in day to day management and team dynamics.

A disaster brings about a drastic change in the attitudes of the three monks and makes them work harmoniously towards the common goal.
However, the importance of technology too needs to be stressed here. Instead on one person running up and down the hill to fetch water, the three monks together devise a pulley mechanism to increase productivity and fulfill the needs of the monastery. This scene stresses the fact that technology plays a pivotal role in reducing the human effort and increasing efficiency.
On a whole, the play conveys the behavior of human mind, some key managerial insights, importance of task sharing and effective planning, use of technology to reduce effort and need for increasing efficiency as well as effectiveness.

In the end, I would like to conclude that the movie is about methods of work. Efficient and effective methods in any situation lead to excellence as is evident from the following table:



Items for comparison
Method I
Method II
Method III
1. Members
One Monk
Two Monks
Three Monks
2. Work tools and  work method
Two baskets
Long pole hanging two buckets two ends of the long stick.
One basket
Long pole hanging  one bucket in the middle
Three baskets
Rope, and pulling water bucket on pulley
3. Input  - Effort by monks  ( Units in Joules)                  ( Estimated figures)
100 Joules  ( J)
 by One person
 < 50 Joules ( J ) by two persons together 
Total effort together by the three monks in this method is almost  
                       ' INSIGNIFICANT'.
4. Output - Water
2 baskets
One basket
The output ( number of baskets of water )  that the method can fetch is almost   ' SO MUCH WATER'
5. Productivity Measure:            ( Input / Output)
100 J / 2 Buckets  = 
50 J per basket of water 
< 50 J / 1 Bucket  = 
< 50  J per basket of water



Insignificant effort per basket of water
6.Nature of Member  Roles 
Independent
Somewhat  Interdependent
Very much Interdependent
7. Monks Life
philosophy@ monastery
Life is misery and
Death is the solution


@ This is evident as shown in the film the monk is physically exhausted and gets in to sleep while doing daily prayer.
Life somehow can be managed to make it worth living.

 @ This is evident as shown in the film the monks engage in more productive prayers. Monks are shown not sleeping as much as they used to do earlier.   
Life is Fun and even monks can have blissful life.


@ This is evident as shown in the film that the monks are happy and blissful to work together. 

That's it for now! The comments are below, let me know what you think.
Onwards and Upwards!

3 comments:

  1. From the analysis that you have shared, I'd say, its a video that gives a holistic perspective on management. Here is another insight that I'd like to share -

    • It is obvious that as a manager, one is not supposed to ignore the elephant in the room. In fact it would be foolish to do so. However, as shown (or rather not shown) in the above analysis of the story - and as is generally the case with us managers, here in India - we tend to fret too much about the elephants (Joules!! :'D ), and in the process, miss out on the mice (the mouse!). To delve deeper into the metaphor, as I’m sure you must have realized by now, a key management lesson to be derived from this video is – “Don’t ignore the problems that seem harmless at the moment.” While filling the bucket is essential for the success of your enterprise, so is not allowing unassuming mice, inadvertently burn down your temple. Dealing with small problems as they occur stops them from multiplying (the mouse gaining confidence with time) while also preventing your colleagues/employees from forming a habit of having those problems around (monks sleeping while the mouse cavorting about, enjoying life, burning temples, etc.)

    • The metaphor of the mouse can also be related to neglecting the quality of the work place/product – especially in the Indian context where Managers tend to do it pretty often - while they focus on the KRAs.

    However, one can always argue that if we try to account for everything that could go wrong, we can never get any work done! But the video has an answer to that as well – keep a look out for the small problems ‘that are visible’, and handle them at the onset, instead of taking them lightly! (Which ‘not-emotionally-charged-about having-to-do-all-the-work’ manager can appreciate mice roaming around in clear sight and laugh at them?)

    • Still another insight that can be drawn from the problem of the mouse is that managers should never lose sight of the problems that affect their colleagues. I can go on and on about it but I hope you get the gist!

    • That the makers of the video wanted to convey the message of small problems mushrooming into big ones (apart from other important messages), has been shown in the way the monks deal with the mouse – depicting how VERY small the problem was.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Love, thanks for your comments.

    I'll admit that I had actually not given much thought to the mouse in the video (thus proving your point!).

    The mouse poses an interesting problem here. Initially the mouse actually helps the first monk, who when doing his work (praying) falls asleep and the mouse wakes him up. But later we see that it is the same mouse that causes the fire. So what I can make out of this is that there might be certain elements (people, habits or practices) which although might provide short term benefits, they could end up doing more harm than good, and any organization should be wary of such risks and try and do its best to eliminate them at the onset.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very brilliantly penned down mayank. great job keep up the good work

    ReplyDelete